Friday, January 16, 2015

“It’s getting hard to keep up with all these Qur’an-inspired atrocities that have nothing to do with Islam”

The number of atrocities committed by adherents to the “religion of peace” but having nothing to do with Islam is mushrooming (“Mushrooming”:  the cloud to soon be sponsored by people having nothing to do with Islam coming to us as soon as they have the means.)

Pat Condell gives another inspired episode about the mind-numbing denial by our “leaders” that Islam has anything to do with the dozens of jihadist attacks carried out weekly in the name of Islam by declared Muslims.  Enjoy (or not).

Can Muslim-Free Zones be Justified?

Another way to consider our attitude toward the myth of “moderate Muslims.”

Suppose you were planning to interview a new employee and you discover his Facebook page that shows his membership to organizations that hate your products and vow to destroy your business.  How would you feel about that applicant?  Would you hire that person?

Being the fair minded person you are, you give him a chance to defend his associations.  He claims he really doesn’t believe everything that organization represents but enjoys some of its other benefits.  In the course of your investigation you also discover that his organization also promotes deception to mask its purpose and  protect its members.  What then would you think about that potential employee?  Will you become a moron and hire him anyway?

Our country has prided itself on first amendment protections – freedom of speech, religion, press.  But what about a religion that disbelieves these things and actively campaigns and intimidates to eliminate these freedoms?  Is that, too, a protected right?  Is that really a “religion?”  Or has it become something else?  Has it become a threatening political ideology?  A seditious organization?  A threat to your freedoms, culture, security?

OK.  So our government moronically desires to ignore the Islamic connection to terror, jihad, massacres, violence, intolerance and hate.  Does that mean the rest of us need to be morons, too?

Here is an example of one business acting in the public interest concerning those who profess their belief in the Islamic ideology and all that Islam has represented over the centuries.  Read to the end.  Ask yourself:  If you had a business, what would you do with a potential employee or customer who declared his faith in an organization that …

  • Declared you an infidel worthy of conversion, death, or 2nd class citizenship (pick one)
  • Expressed hated toward Jews
  • Denied equal treatment of women
  • Kills homosexuals
  • Sanctioned killing family members who disrespect them
  • Promoted intolerance of other beliefs
  • Promoted killing those who insulted their leader or literature
  • Attracted people who carried out more killings and terror than all other organizations combined
  • Encouraged lying and deceit to further the cause of the organization

But then that “member” declares that neither he nor his organization really believes those things, despite a) The teachings of its founder, b) The historical actions of his organization, c)  The content of its founding documents, d) The teaching of most of its current leaders, e) The actions of a huge numbers of its current membership.

Here is the response of one business person who has done what our government should have done after 9-11.  She has declared the business for which she is responsible a “Muslim  Free Zone.”  Read on to see how rational that action really is.  And then try to explain to me why every business in this country shouldn’t do the same thing:

______________

Jan Morgan is facing controversy after declaring her business a “Muslim free zone” Sunday.

The owner of Gun Cave Indoor Shooting Range in Hot Springs, Ark. has drawn a line in the sand, and while critics will get angry they should read her reasons why.

After the recent influx of violence perpetuated by self-proclaimed Islamists, Morgan began to study the religion and discovered “109 verses commanding hate, murder and terror against all human beings who refuse to submit or convert to Islam.”

On her website, Jan Morgan Media, Morgan, an investigative journalist and certified NRA gun instructor, explained that her decision was made based on facts.

Read her ten-point reasoning that has already provoked controversy:

____________

I officially declare my business, The Gun Cave Indoor Shooting Range, a MUSLIM FREE ZONE . . .

1) The Koran, which I have read and studied thoroughly and (which all muslims align themselves with), contains 109 verses commanding hate, murder and terror against all human beings who refuse to submit or convert to Islam. Read those verses of violence here.

2) My life has been threatened repeatedly by muslims who are angry that I have studied their koran and have, over the past two years, been exposing the vileness of the Koran and its murderous directives.

3) * The barbaric act of beheading an innocent American in Oklahoma by a muslim

* the Boston bombings (by muslims)
* the Fort Hood mass shooting (by a muslim) that killed 13 people and injured over 30 people
* and the murder of 3000 innocent people (by muslims) on 9/11

This is more than enough loss of life on my home soil at the hands of muslims to substantiate my position that muslims can and will follow the directives in their Koran and kill here at home.

4) Because the nature of my business involves firearms and shooting firearms in an enclosed environment, my patrons are not comfortable being around muslims who align themselves with a religion that clearly commands hate, murder, and violence against all non muslims. Therefore many of my patrons are uncomfortable around Muslims with guns. (can you blame them?)

5) My range rents and sells guns to my patrons. Why would I want to rent or sell a gun and hand ammunition to someone who aligns himself with a religion that commands him to kill me?

6) * Muslims, who belong to and, or, support ISIS, are threatening to kill innocent Americans.

* Muslims, who belong to or support AL Qaeda, are threatening to kill innocent Americans.
* Muslims who belong to or support HAMAS are threatening to kill innocent Americans.

See a common thread here?

7) I not only have the right to refuse service but a RESPONSIBILITY to provide a safe environment for people to shoot and train on firearms. I can and have turned people away if I sense they are under the influence of alcohol or mind altering drugs. I have a federal firearms license…

The ATF informed us when we received the license that if we feel any reason for concern about selling someone a firearm, even sense that something is not right about an individual, or we are concerned about that persons mental state, even if they pass a background check, we do not have to sell that person a gun.

In other words, a federal agency has given us this kind of discretion for service based on the nature of the business. I can and have turned people away if I sense an issue with their mental state. So… its difficult to imagine how the DOJ could have issues with this when ATF gave us this discretion.

8) I have no way of looking at Islam other than as a theocracy, not a religion. Islam is undoubtedly the union of political, legal, and religious ideologies. In other words law, religion and state are forged together to form what Muslims refer to as “The Nation of Islam.” Once again it is given the sovereign qualities of a nation with clerics in the governing body and Sharia law all in one. This is a Theocracy, not a religion.

The US Constitution does not protect a theocracy. The 1st Amendment is very specific about protecting the rights of individuals from the government, as it concerns the practice of religions, not theocracies. It clearly differentiates between government and religion. Again protecting the individual’s religious beliefs and practices from (the state) government. In Islam, religion and state are one.

We are a Nation governed by laws, or the law of the land the U.S. Constitution. We are not a Nation that is governed by religion, politicians or clerics.

How then, can anyone say that, the practice of Islam is protected by the U.S. Constitution?

The Muslim brotherhood has a documented plan for the destruction of America from within, discovered by our own government during a raid of MB operatives in America. In addition, I am very cognizant of the civilization jihad under way in my country by American Muslims. In a number of states Muslims, through our legal system, are trying to force us to accept Sharia Law over Constitutional law. I do not wish to do business with people who stand against the Constitution and are fighting to replace it.

9) Islam allows Muslims to kill their own children, (honor killing) if the behavior of those children embarrasses or dishonors the family name. (did you know that dating outside of the faith is justification for murdering their daughters and this has already occurred on American soil?) Why would I want people (who believe it’s okay to murder their own children), be in the presence of other children? My patrons often bring their kids to the range to teach them to shoot. I am responsible for providing a safe environment for those children to learn gun safety and shooting sports.

10) In the 14 hundred year history of Islam, muslims have murdered over 270 million people. Not all muslims are terrorists, but almost all terrorists in the world right now are muslim. Since you can’t determine by visual assessment, which ones will kill you and which ones will not, I am going to go with the line of thought that ANY HUMAN BEING who would either knowingly or unknowingly support a “religion” that commands the murder of all people who refuse to submit or convert to that religion, is not someone I want to know or do business with. I hold adults accountable for the religion they align themselves with.

In summary, I not only have the right, but a responsibility to provide a safe environment for my customers. I do not believe my decision is religious discrimination because I do not classify islam as a religion.. It is a theocracy/terrorist organization that hides behind the mask of religion in order to achieve its mission of world domination.

People who shoot at my range come from all religious backgrounds… some are atheists… I do not care about their religious beliefs. I care about the safety of my customers who come to shoot here. The government allows businesses to ban me from entering their business with my gun because the property owner feels uncomfortable or wants to provide a “safe” environment for their patrons which is in clear violation of my 2nd Amendment right to bear arms, so…

I should be able to deny service to people on the same premise. Can my government really force me to invite someone who had threatened to kill me, into my home or business?

I will do whatever is necessary to provide a safe environment for my customers, even at the cost of the increased threats and legal problems this decision will likely provoke.

Jan Morgan- owner / The Gun Cave Indoor Shooting Range

Wednesday, January 14, 2015

Why gas prices will be below $1.80 soon, and why the long term consequences suck…

HERE is a great article that explains why we have low oil prices, how low they will go, and how long these prices will last.

Short answer:  Oil will go below $30 a barrel and gasoline below $1.50 a gallon.  Saudi Arabia has promised to maintain current production levels to purposely lower prices.  Why?  So Saudi Arabia can maintain its market share by killing competition, especially in the United States.

So those of us hoping for US energy independence to cease funding Islamists who yearn to extend their Islamic caliphate to the US or chop off our heads, it doesn’t look like energy independence will happen any time soon.  The only way I see a potential for the US persevering is for our oil production to be subsidized by our government until we can reduce the cost of production through technological advances.  And that might require 10 years – probably longer.

Conspiracy theory alert:  This has nothing to do with Obama being good buds with the Saudi’s, and partnering to kill the evil fracking business, right?  A twofer for him.

So, break out your burkas ladies.  And men, sharpen your scimitars.  Encourage your kids to learn Arabic.

And we were concerned with having to press “1” for English?  Hurumph!

Saturday, January 10, 2015

Who Enables Benedict Arnold?

Pat Boone makes a compelling argument for Obama being our current day Benedict Arnold (read below).  But I would like to know who enabled our present day Benedict Arnold and why most of us still choose to deny this fact?

 (Thanks to World Net Daily)

_________________________________

TODAY'S BENEDICT ARNOLD

A traitor in the White House? If the shoe fits ...

Exclusive: Pat Boone offers 'hypothetical' scenario of treason in nation's highest office

Published: 14 hours ago

“The traitor rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.”

– Marcus Tullius Cicero, 1st century B.C.

What is treason? Good old Webster’s Dictionary describes it simply as “betrayal of one’s country to an enemy.” And traitor as “one who betrays one’s country, cause, friends, etc.”

I’ve recently read a biography of Benedict Arnold, American history’s most notorious traitor. Though he was beneficiary of our young country’s opportunities and honors, rising through the military to the rank of major general, historians record he was arrogant and impatient with civilian deliberateness and legislative oversight. He courted the favor of British loyalists, angering the patriots – and exhibited such a love and need for money that he lined his pockets with questionable side ventures.

He decided he wasn’t sufficiently appreciated by his fellows and formulated a treasonous plan to crush the Revolution and revenge himself on Congress. When, amazingly, he was given the command of West Point, he plotted with British Gen. Clinton to surrender the fort for 20,000 pounds! The plot was discovered, and Arnold barely managed to escape to England, where he lived out his life as a social outcast … and infamous traitor.

Is it remotely possible such a terrible thing could happen in America today? What would one of our leaders have to do to be accused of treason?

Well, let’s create a purely hypothetical scenario.

Suppose America elects a charismatic young president who makes all kinds of brave promises and sweeps into the White House. This young man not only has little political or governmental experience, but none at all in business or administration. Curiously, his upbringing is never closely examined or evaluated; it’s just assumed that anybody elected president must love America – but this young man had been trained by parents and others to consider this country a colonial oppressor and unfit to be a world leader! In college, by his own autobiographical account, he sought out Marxist professors, in not one but three colleges.

Once elected, he uses his newfound executive authority to seal off all his early school, passport and travel records, lest his true intents be uncovered. He eventually has a fake “copy of a birth certificate” created and exhibited on the White House website, complete with glaring errors that betray its falsehood. Somehow Congress seems mesmerized and intimidated from confronting him, so he creates a phalanx of legislative “czars” to regulate and virtually stifle all business and energy progress, and these “czars” – among them known Muslim and Marxist and homosexual activists – report not to Congress but directly to him!

Having declared that he considered the U.S. Constitution a “flawed” document, he proceeds as president to ride roughshod over the document and its establishment of three separate and equal branches of our government, declaring openly if Congress won’t give him what he wants, he “has a phone and a pen” and will make executive decisions and even change laws he has crammed through the legislature, determined to effectively dismantle the two-party system and the separation-of-powers concept.

Now, theoretically, many might call all this treason. But wait.

Suppose that this increasingly arrogant young man, having become commander in chief of the military, begins to quietly fire and replace full admirals and generals who object to his decisions to withdraw from territories gained by the lives of 4,000 brave young Americans, and to issue more orders that will weaken the whole defense system and cost more young American lives. Treason? Wait …

Suppose this pompous man also appoints an attorney general who announces with him that they not only will enable hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens to invade the country – but that they will not enforce the immigration laws themselves! This, knowing that among those undocumented aliens there would certainly be trained enemies of the United States, whose sole purpose for crossing our borders is to destroy the country he had learned to despise as a young man. And what if this attorney general concocts a scheme to furnish thousands of weapons to Mexican drug cartels and potential terrorists? Treason? The case is building.

Now suppose that this Manchurian (or Indonesian) Candidate, never having any business or economic experience, but knowing that one vital reason for America’s world dominance is its giant economy, forces through a weak and compliant Congress decisions that add trillions of dollars of unpayable, inexcusable debt, piling up three times more debt on American taxpayers and businesses than all past presidents combined! In this unthinkable scenario, he is systematically crippling, bankrupting and discrediting his country. And in all of the this, he’s following the plan he had learned from a famous Communist Party organizer.

Now, in this imagined story, we can add the deliberate dividing of the citizens along racial, economic and political lines. We can add his awarding billions of dollars of speculative contracts to party donors and even family friends. We can toss in his leaving his command post while a U.S. ambassador and other Americans are under fire and eventually dying … to pack his bags and fly to Las Vegas for a political fundraiser. A definite Benedict Arnold comparison.

And, to leave no doubt whatsoever, while our nation is slipping into all-out war against inhuman killers who behead innocent people, this pretender in chief makes the personal decision to release known murderers from a military prison and to send them back to the Mideast, all expenses paid and with no penalty for their crimes, to supposedly “rehab” – and then certainly reassume leadership positions with our murderous enemies. No consultation with, or consent from, Congress. Just his own decision, knowing brave young Americans will face these beasts again in a battle to the death. If there’s a clearer definition of treason, I can’t think of it.

All this is theoretical, of course – but I think if such an interloper and subversive impostor were to somehow arise and become our president, if he weren’t eventually exposed, prosecuted and impeached, America should apologize to Benedict Arnold.

And his picture should be posted in Webster’s alongside the words “treason” and “traitor.”

Who is that masked man?

____________________

Pat Boone, descendant of the legendary pioneer Daniel Boone, has been a top-selling recording artist, the star of his own hit TV series, a movie star, a Broadway headliner, and a best-selling author in a career that has spanned half a century. During the classic rock & roll era of the 1950s, he sold more records than any artist except Elvis Presley.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/01/a-traitor-in-the-white-house-if-the-shoe-fits/#WCrcW9rfpvT8eflI.99

Thursday, January 08, 2015

Denial that Jihad is Doctrinally Sound Islam Denies Reality…

But liberals, the ignorant and many conservatives persist in denial.

Here is the latest example of Muslim Jihad denial following the Muslim atrocity in Paris, this by undeniable liberal Howard Dean…

“I stopped calling these people Muslim terrorists. They're about as Muslim as I am," he said. "I mean, they have no respect for anybody else's life, that's not what the Koran says.”

Either Howard is ignorant of the Qur’an and the duality of the Islamic ideology, or he is awkwardly declaring himself Muslim.

France has suffered from the same problem Howard has – Islam denial.

French intelligence had these Muslims on their radar for a number of years.  Pam Geller notes that…

“…questions are being raised about “how Chérif Kouachi, so well known to the police for so many years, and his brother had managed to conceal their intentions. Part of the answer may be that they appear to have moved smoothly between normal immigrant society and an extremist Islamist underground.

“Sounds like there is little difference between “normal” Muslim society versus “extreme Islamist underground.” Did no one in “normal Muslim” society speak, see, or hear anything wrong? if not? Why not?

“His Paris imam urged him to kill American troops in Iraq as it “presented a better outlet for his commitment to jihad.”

- See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2015/01/heres-what-we-know-about-the-terrorist-background-of-the-paris-jihad-mass-murders.html/#sthash.fCDabQGE.dpuf

There are several things to note here. 

1)  There are more than 2.1 million Muslims in France, an estimated total of 5 to 10 percent of the national population.  France has the largest number of Muslims of any nation in Western Europe.

2)  Muslims will defend and protect other Muslims.

3)  The Muslim imams of France must not be Muslim either, since they urge fellow Muslims to commit Islamic jihad.

Islam goes beyond  attracting merely the lazy and ignorant that tend to flock to the socialist/entitlement culture.  Islam also attracts the misfits, the angry, the disenfranchised and the criminal element of western society.  While every other religion promotes moderation, tolerance, and non-violence as ideals, Islam promotes the opposite.   Islamic ideology, its’ “holy books” and teachings of the imams promote intolerance, hatred, and violence in the name of Islam.  

To quote one commentator regarding the goals and purpose of Islam:

“Not your normal goal or purpose of religion. Islam from it's inception formed a religion that was pseudo-righteous cover for criminal behavior. In Islam, major criminal behaviors are incorporated with a religious nameplate, but are in fact designed to gain overwhelming power by giving the average male Muslim believer fighting in Jihad, control of the infidels he conquers, as a criminal would have over victims in the commission of a crime, and yet the perpetrator of these crimes feels he is doing God's will.

Stolen wealth and sexual debauchery are the rewards that can be had here on earth in Jihad. This formula has given Islam the young male converts it needed to form large armies to conquer all civilizations in Western Asia and many in Europe. It is time to speak boldly against Islam as a religion of peace or even as a religion.”

Yes, “or even as a religion.”  Islam should be treated as a seditious ideology, much like Nazism was during WWII or any perverse cultish movement that desire to infiltrate and radically transform our government and culture.  Islam is even more insidious because of its religious façade which provides cover much as the Trojan Horse of old. 

Howard Dean, like most liberals and even many conservatives in the West, denies this Islamic history and their present day doctrines.  Fools, all.

Will France learn from this?  Will we?

Tuesday, January 06, 2015

The elusive “moderate” Islam…

The media, academia, and politicians claim that moderate Islam predominates in the Muslim world.   They insist “radical” Islam is only in the mind of the Islamophobe.

Reality says otherwise, as Daniel Greenfield elaborates, below.  This is from the website 10News.dk

______________________________

Daniel Greenfield’s famous, classical chronicle on how Leftist politicians invented “moderate Islam” to make voters accept the import of Muslim voters for the Left. Statistics backing Greenfield’s point here.

Via Dispatch International:

I have been searching for moderate Islam since September 11 and just like a lost sock in the dryer, it was in the last place I expected it to be.

There is no moderate Islam in the mosques or in Mecca. You won’t find it in the Koran or the Hadiths. If you want to find moderate Islam, browse the newspaper editorials after a terrorist attack or take a course on Islamic religion taught by a Unitarian Sociologist wearing fake native jewelry.
You can’t find a moderate Islam in Saudi Arabia or Iran, but you can find it in countless network news specials, articles and books about the two homelands of their respective brands of Islam.

You won’t find the fabled land of moderate Muslims in the east. You won’t even find it in the west. Like all myths it exists in the imagination of those who tell the stories. You won’t find a moderate Islam in the Koran, but you will find it in countless Western books about Islam.

Moderate Islam isn’t what most Muslims believe. It’s what most liberals believe that Muslims believe.

The new multicultural theology of the West is moderate Islam. Moderate Islam is the perfect religion for a secular age since it isn’t a religion at all.
Take Islam, turn it inside out and you have moderate Islam. Take a Muslim who hasn’t been inside a mosque in a year, who can name the entire starting lineup of the San Diego Chargers, but can’t name Mohammed’s companions and you have a moderate Muslim. Or more accurately, a secular Muslim.

An early generation of Western leaders sought the affirmation of their national destinies in the divine. This generation of Western leaders seeks the affirmation of their secular liberalism in a moderate Islam.

Even if they have to make it up.

Without a moderate Islam the Socialist projects of Europe which depend on heavy immigration collapse. America’s War on Terror becomes the endless inescapable slog that the rise of ISIS has once again revealed it to be. Multiculturalism, post-nationalism and Third World Guiltism all implode.

Without moderate Muslims, nationalism returns, borders close and the right wins. That is what they fear.

If there is no moderate Islam, no moderate Mohammed, no moderate Allah, then the Socialist Kingdom of Heaven on Earth has to go in the rubbish bin. The grand coalitions in which LGBT activists and Islamists scream at Jews over Gaza aren’t the future; they’re the Weimar Republic on wheels.

Flash back to Obama in his tan suit wearily saying that he has no strategy for ISIS. The original plan was to capture Osama alive, give him a civilian trial, cut a deal with the moderate Taliban and announce the end of the War on Terror before the midterm elections.

So much for that.

Moderate Islam is a difficult faith. To believe in it you have to disregard over a thousand years of recorded history, theology, demographics and just about everything that predates 1965. You have to ignore the bearded men chopping off heads because they don’t represent the majority of Muslims.

Neither does Mohammed, who did his own fair share of headchopping. The real Islam is a topic that non-Muslims of no faith who hold sacred only the platitudes of a post-everything society are eager to lecture on without knowing anything about it.

Their Islam is not the religion of Mohammed, the Koran, the Hadiths, the Caliphs or its practitioners in such places as Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Iran, Iraq or Indonesia. Their Islam is a religion that does not exist, but that they fervently believe must exist because without it their way of life is as doomed as the dodo.

They aren’t Muslims. They have no faith in Allah or the Koran. Instead they have faith in the goodness of an Islam that exists without resort to scriptures, theology or deity. This may seem strange to actual believers, but after all their own poor tattered scraps of Christianity or Judaism don’t bother paying too much attention to deities or scriptures except when it comes to cherry-picking quotes about tolerance.

Is it any wonder that they treat Islam the same way?

The true moderate Muslims are secular liberals of loosely Christian and Jewish persuasion who have invented and believe in a moderate Islam that doesn’t exist outside of their own heads. This secular Islam, which values all life, is dedicated to social justice and universal tolerance, is a counterpart of their own bastardized religions. And they are too afraid to wake up and realize that it doesn’t exist.

When American and European leaders insist that Islam has nothing to do with the latest Islamic atrocity, they are not referencing a religion practiced by Muslims, but an imaginary religion that they imagine Muslims must practice because the alternative is the end of everything that they believe in.

Their moderate Islam is light on the details, beyond standing for social justice, fighting Global Warming and supporting gay rights, because it is really multiculturalism wearing a fake beard. When a Western leader claims that the latest batch of Islamic terrorists don’t speak for Islam, he isn’t defending Muslims, he’s defending multiculturalism. He assumes that Muslims believe in multiculturalism because he does.

Moderate Islam is just multiculturalism misspelled. Its existence is a firm article of faith for those who believe in multiculturalism.

Dissuading a believer in moderate Muslims from his invented faith by citing the long trail of corpses or the hateful Hadiths that call for mass murder is futile because these are not the roots of his religion. He doesn’t know what a Hadith is nor does he care. As a social justice man in good standing, he attributes the violent track record of Islam to European colonialism and oppression.

He has never read the Koran. He has read a thousand articles about how Muslims are oppressed at the airport, in Gaza, in Burma and in Bugs Bunny cartoons. They are his new noble savages and he will not hear a word against them. Having colonized their identities in his imagination (despite the marked up copy of Edward Said’s Orientalism that he keeps by his bedside) he treats them as reflections of his ego.

When you say that moderate Muslims don’t exist, you are calling him a bad person. When you challenge Islam, you are attacking multiculturalism and he will call you a racist, regardless of the fact that Islam is as much of a race as Communism, Nazism or the Mickey Mouse Fan Club were races.

The moderate Muslim is an invention of the liberal academic, the secular theologian, the vapid politician and his shrill idiot cousin, the political activist. Like the money in the budgets that underpin their plans and the scientific evidence for Global Warming, he does not exist.

And it is not necessary that he should exist. It is only necessary that we have faith in his existence.

The degraded lefty descendants of Christians and Jews wait for a moderate Muslim messiah who will reconcile the impossibilities of their multicultural society by healing the conflicts between Islam and the West. Until they find him, they have to believe, not in a divinity, but in the moderate Muslim.

_______________________

All of the above makes even more sense when you review the following:  (thanks to Robert D.):

IS THERE A COMMON DENOMINATOR HERE?

*The Shoe Bomber was a Muslim
*The Beltway Snipers were Muslims
*The Fort Hood Shooter was a Muslim
*The Underwear Bomber was a Muslim
*The U-S.S. Cole Bombers were Muslims
*The Madrid Train Bombers were Muslims
*The Bali Nightclub Bombers were Muslims
*The London Subway Bombers were Muslims
*The Moscow Theatre Attackers were Muslims
*The Boston Marathon Bombers were Muslims
*The Pan-Am flight #93 Bombers were Muslims
*The Air France Entebbe Hijackers were Muslims
*The Iranian Embassy Takeover, was by Muslims
*The Beirut U.S. Embassy Bombers were Muslims
*The Libyan U.S. Embassy Attack was by Muslims
*The Buenos Aires Suicide Bombers were Muslims
*The Israeli Olympic Team Attackers were Muslims
*The Kenyan U.S, Embassy Bombers were Muslims
*The Saudi, Khobar Towers Bombers were Muslims
*The Beirut Marine Barracks Bombers were Muslims
*The Besian Russian School Attackers were Muslims
 

*The First World Trade Center Bombers were Muslims
*The Bombay, Mumbai, India Attackers were Muslims
*The Achille Lauro Cruise Ship Hijackers were Muslims
*The Nairobi, Kenya Shopping Mall Killers were Muslims
*The September 11th 2001 Airline Hijackers were Muslims
*The Sydney, Australia Lindt Cafe Kidnapper was a Muslims
*The Peshawar, Pakistani School Children Killers were Muslims

*The Boston Marathon Bombers were Muslims
*The cop killer in New York City was a Muslim

THE REST OF US?

*Hindus living with Jews = No Problem
*Baha'is living with Jews = No Problem
*Jews living with Atheists = No Problem
*Sikhs living with Hindus = No Problem
*Hindus living with Baha'is = No Problem
*Christians living with Jews = No Problem
*Jews living with Buddhists = No Problem
*Shintos living with Atheists = No Problem
*Buddhists living with Sikhs = No Problem
*Baha'is living with Christians = No Problem
*Buddhists living with Shintos = No Problem
*Buddhists living with Hindus = No Problem
*Hindus living with Christians = No Problem
*Atheists living with Buddhists = No Problem
*Confusians living with Hindus = No Problem
*Atheists living with Confucians = No Problem

CONTRAST THIS WITH:

*Muslims living with Jews = Problem
*Muslims living with Sikhs = Problem
*Muslims living with Hindus = Problem
*Muslims living with Baha'is = Problem
*Muslims living with Shintos = Problem
*Muslims living with Atheists = Problem
*Muslims living with Buddhists = Problem
*Muslims living with Christians = Problem
 

*MUSLIMS LIVING WITH MUSLIMS = VERY BIG PROBLEM

***********THE CONSEQUENCES ***************** *
*They're not happy in Gaza
*They're not happy in Egypt
*They're not happy in Libya
*They're not happy in Iran
*They're not happy in Iraq
*They're not happy in Yemen
*They're not happy in Pakistan
*They're not happy in Syria
*They're not happy in Lebanon
*They're not happy in Nigeria
*They're not happy in Kenya
*They're not happy in Sudan
*They're not happy in Morocco
*They're not happy in Afghanistan

SO, WHERE ARE THEY HAPPY?
*They're happy in Australia
*They're happy in Belgium
*They're happy in France
*They're happy in Holland
*They're happy in Italy
*They're happy in Germany
*They're happy in Spain
*They're happy in Sweden
*They're happy in Denmark
*They're happy in the USA & Canada
*They're happy in Norway & India
*They're very happy in England (UK) (Loads of Welfare Benefits)

They're happy in almost every country that is not Islamic!

And who do they blame? Not Islam... Not their leadership.. . Not themselves.. .

THEY BLAME THE COUNTRIES WHERE THEY ARE HAPPY!!

And they want to change the countries they're happy in, to be like the
countries they came from where they were unhappy !!!!

*Islamic Jihad: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
*ISIS: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
*Al-Qaeda: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
*Taliban: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
* Boko Haram: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
*Al-Nusra: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
*Abu Sayyaf: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
*Al-Badr: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
*Muslim Brotherhood: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
*Lashkar-e-Taiba: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
*Ansaru: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
*Jemaah Islamiyah: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
*Abdullah Azzam Brigades: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION
*Al-Shabbab Somalia: AN ISLAMIC TERROR ORGANIZATION

AND DOZENS MORE!!!!!!

Wednesday, December 31, 2014

Freedom vs. Self-restraint; Can vs. Should

There is a line from one of the Celtic Thunder songs that goes like this:

Come by the hills to the land where fancy is free…

Where “fancy is free.”  That is an idiom for “fancy free” where “fancy” means whatever your imagination conjures for you to do.  You are free to do whatever your little cottin’ pickin’ heart desires.  In the context of this song, the motive is pure and good.  Just as the thoughts surrounding the word “gay” were pure and good until a few decades ago.

Freedom is nice.  It is good knowing we are free to do whatever we want.

The producers of the movie “The Interview” were free to do whatever they want.  So they created a movie full of vile, vulgar, and generally tasteless words and behavior, ostensibly to cater to a particular demographic that believes that type of dialogue is cool.  The film made money.  Everyone except the North Koreans were happy.

Is “freedom” being abused?  Absolutely.

The leftist protestors in New York are “fancy free”.  Al Sharpton and Bill deBlasio, too.  They are free to say what they want – even if what they say is based on lies and distortions.  And they do, despite the consequences of their actions.  The end justifies the means.  Their “means” are lies and distortions.  Their end?  Who knows?   Their “freedom” to spout distortions that happen to also be incendiary is more important to them then the truth.  They prefer the consequences of their distortions than the consequences of the truth.

This concern about being “incendiary” or “offensive” is a two edged sword.  Desire for restraint depends on whose ox is being gored.  If I chose to use my freedom to speak out against Islamic ideology because that ideology promotes violence against infidels, and that speech upsets some Muslims, I would not want someone telling me to shut up – just because someone is offended and might go into a psychotic rage.  The truth is more important than offense of the truth.

Speech used to promote lies, distortions, slander (untruthful claims), should not be given the same claim to “freedom” as promoting truth.  Al Sharpton and Bill deBlasio were distorting the truth in their “free speech” to promote their political agenda.  They failed to acknowledge the facts of the cases they used to incite violence.  They abused their rights to “free speech.”

In the case of profane movies and vulgar TV shows and other media, they, too, abuse their right to freedom and free speech.

Islam would not have as much of an attraction in the West – with their perverse version of “morality” - if we in the West treated our freedoms with greater respect.

In fact, we have become so “fancy free” in our culture that we have become immune to knowing what is of value and what is not.  We can no longer distinguish between what we “can” say and what we “should” say.  We use “freedom” as an excuse to turn off our sense of morality and just about any other sense that we have remaining.  “Can” trumps “should.”  Self-restraint?  What’s that?

Monday, December 22, 2014

Lone wolves? Really? Officials unleash a “denial of sanity” attack.

You techies out there have heard of “denial of service” attacks where a computer system is overloaded with incoming trash that clogs up your processing system or network.  Well, we are experiencing a denial of sanity attack where so much bull shit is coming in from our leaders that our sense of sanity is being challenged.

The cop killer in New York?  The Boston Marathon terrorists?  The Hassan Fort Hood Massacre?  Dozens more, reported and unreported?  These are “loan wolves?” 

Lone wolves:  Really?  Saying these are “lone wolves” is a denial of sanity attack by those we have graced with authority and “leadership.”  You get enough lone wolves doing the same sort of things and you have a distributed pack of wolves.  And many among this pack of wolves, not coincidentally, share a common belief system, a common ideology, some call it a common “faith”:  Islam.  Islam, the ancient, barbaric belief system that motivates 95% of all terrorist acts in the world today.

Loan wolves:  All with a common motivation and common purpose.  Islam provides an excuse, a justification, to release their pent up anger and psychotic rage on whatever pisses them off at the moment.

Unfortunately, our “denial of sanity” leaders – Obama, deBlasio, Sharpton, Holder, and dozens of others – add to the motivation of these “loan wolves” with their blame of everyone except the lone wolves and the ideologies that motivate most of them.  They elevate and coddle these scum in the same way a punk in school is rewarded for his behavior by punishing the entire class.  Example:  Instead of profiling Muslims coming to and fro in our airports, we are all subject to invasive, costly, often humiliating searches.  (Note to self:  Always consider Islam more “fascist political ideology” than mere “religion.”)

These deniers of reality claim we have a “race” problem.  Yup, we do now.  They renewed it.   From 1950 through 2004, the “race problem” was fantastically improved to the point where race was not on our list of national problems at all.  Drastic change resulted with the arrival of Obama as president.

Just as Obama complains about the United States when he is speaking in enemy nations, he also complains about the 90% of us who are law abiding citizens and defends or embraces the terrorists, the psychotics, and the scum.  You don’t think it isn’t motivational to these “loan wolves” when the highest leaders of the land excuse their behavior and condemn the rest of us for who knows what? 

Couple this with any predisposition these lone wolf elements have toward ideologies like Islam, Crypts, Nation of Islam, Black Panthers, Communist Party, CAIR, etc. and you generate a whole new cadre of “loan wolves.”  And this is exactly what our leaders are doing.

Pam Geller provides compelling insight in this based on the ongoing New York City fiasco motivated by deBlasio, Sharpton, and Obama HERE.  And Diana West comments on “See No Islam” HERE.

 

Wednesday, December 03, 2014

Recent encouraging events…

What could possibly go wrong?

It is the season of the year to turn our thoughts from the discouraging events that have occurred throughout the year and focus on some of the positive and encouraging happenings that have recently taken place.

Here is a listing of some of them, along with an open-minded, realistic assessment of how truly “encouraging” these event might really be.

The election: 

Republicans won the Senate.  Whew.  Allelujah!  Finally we can reverse Obamacare, secure our borders, reunite with our allies, pay off the national debt, become energy independent and admit Islam is an evil subversive political ideology.

The reality:   Look at what the Republican House is doing now:  promoting amnesty legislation.  Look at what Romney just said:  “We have to swallow hard” to pass amnesty legislation.  Even when the newly minted republican majority convenes, they cannot overcome either a presidential veto or a senate filibuster.  The choices will be either government gridlock or compromise which is most likely to favor more illegal immigrants, more government spending, more debt, and no oil pipeline and no energy independence. 

Here are a few current Drudge Report headlines on immigration:

SESSIONS: Republicans On Verge Of Breaking Campaign Promises...
LEFT MOCKS: 'War' on Obama's immigration order lasted about 5 minutes...
'Symbolic' Vote on Amnesty...
Gutiérrez presses 'millions' to get documents ready...
Mayors plan summit to implement...
Guatemala paper reports Obama decree has increased illegal immigration to USA...

The result:  Expect more talk but don’t expect very much change.

The Ferguson Grand Jury decision:

No charges were brought against officer Wilson of the Ferguson PD.  Yippee.  Justice is served.

The Reality:  The President invites thugs, rioters and mob members to the White House to discuss the implication of Ferguson.  The media and our federal government continue to distrust and disparage our legal system, rule of law, results of the Ferguson Grand Jury and police departments nationwide.  The punks, racists, and hoodlums are being coddled and celebrated.

The result:  Expect a further breakdown of civility in our cities.

Gas prices:

Gas prices are down to around $2.60 from a high close to $4.00 in the past year.  That is a result of an oversupply due in most part to our burgeoning shale oil industry.  Yippee.  We’re turning the corner on energy independence.

The reality:  Prices are lower because of reduced demand and increased supply.  Demand is lower because of less consumption due to recessions in a number of nations.  Supply remains high because Saudi Arabia does not want to lose market share.  So they are purposely pumping at a steady rate to create an oversupply that lowers prices to a point that will destroy the profitability of our shale industry.  They will do everything in their power to discourage the US from becoming energy independent. 

The result:  Unless the profitability of the US shale oil industry is maintained by subsidizing the difference between the market price and cost of production plus a reasonable profit, that industry will wither and die.

Stock prices:

Stock prices are at record highs.  Things are looking good.

The reality:  Stock prices are at record highs because interest rates are at record lows.  This is a temporary condition that is impossible to perpetuate for two reasons:  The price to earnings ratios do not support the current stock prices and the US dollar cannot long survive record low interest rates.  In fact, the pattern of the market of the past several months is mimicking the pattern leading up to the collapse of 2008.

The result:  Look for a significant collapse of the stock market within the next year.

Unemployment rate:

The unemployment rate is down to below 6% from a high of near 10%.  Wow!  This is great!

The reality:  The Labor Force Participation rate is at its lowest level since 1978.  Most new jobs are part time and lower paying.

cotd lfpr

The result:  “Despite monthly job growth that has surged well over 200,000 this year [mostly part time/low wage jobs], average annual wage gains remain stuck at 2% — barely enough to keep pace with inflation. Employers' failure to provide bigger raises has crimped consumer spending, which makes up 70% of the economy.”

Source:  USA Today

And finally, Google searches for “economic collapse” increased 152% during this past week.

There you have it.  I have successfully turned what appears to be a variety of silk purses into a number of sows ears.  Sorry about that.  But that is reality.

Tuesday, November 25, 2014

We Won’t Enforce Civility…

Why was Ferguson burned and looted after the Grand Jury rendered its judgment on the fate of Officer Wilson?  Why was the Missouri National Guard not called in?  Why did neither the St. Louis County nor the Ferguson Police Department fire a single shot to defend the community against looting and burning?

Here is what I predicted two weeks ago:

There will be those who want law enforcement to compromise, to “back off”, to allow a few windows to be smashed, a few businesses to be looted, a few cars to be destroyed, a few cops to be bloodied.  God forbid.  That gives special privilege to jackasses.  It mocks the rule of law.  It’s like creating a special “no-go” zone in our cities for hooligans, just like the Muslim ghettos in Dearborn and many European cities where Islamic law is given the green light to fester and terrorize.

And it has come to pass.  Democratic Governor Jay Nixon, apparently following Obama’s lead, invoked the “back off” strategy so as to not offend the demonstrators, looters, shooters and arsonists.

Well, how did that work out for Ferguson?

Such is the results of the new “no go zone” in one of this nation’s great cities.  I expect we will see a lot more of this type of non-enforcement of our laws and civility.  “We cannot won’t legislate civility” has now replaced “we can’t legislate morality.”