Tuesday, April 03, 2012

From the “who the hell does he think he is” department…

King Obama has “audacity” gushing out of all of his orifices.

With all due respect * Mr. president, what do you suppose is meant by “separation of powers?”  What do you suppose is the purpose of the three branches of government?  What do you suppose is the purpose of the Constitution?

What, Mr. President, do you think was the result of Marbury vs. Madison?

Among other findings, the Supreme Court in Marbury vs. Madison ruled:

“The Supreme Court has the authority to review acts of Congress and determine whether they are unconstitutional and therefore void.”

So, Mr. president, you confront members of the Supreme Court declaring…

"For years, what we've heard is the biggest problem on the bench was judicial activism or the lack of judicial restraint, that an unelected group of people would somehow overturn a duly constituted and passed law…"

What a twisted attempt at intimidation.  This so-called constitutional scholar denies the possibility that ObamaCare is unconstitutional.  He has taken it upon himself to serve as Executive, Legislature, and Judiciary of this nation.  He is using a legitimate concern of conservatives, “judicial activism”, and using it as an argument against testing legislation against the Constitution.  He is suggesting that a whack job piece of legislation that nobody read is de facto immune from any constitutional tests.

The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals notes the audacity of the President’s challenge to the Supreme Court by ordering the Department of Justice by next Thursday to explain whether the Obama administration believes the courts have the right to strike down a federal law.

I cannot tell you how happy I will be when this Islamo-sympathizing, radical, anti-constitutionalist, capitalism-hating, wealth redistributing, neo-commie is no longer in office.

* I really cringe at having to say this about our president, but this president is worthy of very little, if any, respect.  Therefore the phrase “with all due respect” is essentially meaningless.

No comments: